The European Environmental Agency sets pollution exposure standards in its EU’s air quality directives (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC). These standards should not be exceeded in a given period of time. If they are nevertheless exceeded, then European governments have to find ways to act and reduce the pollutants. What is very surprising is that the EU target values are much lower than the World Health Organization guidelines. What is going on?Read More
In the news / New articles / Conference and seminar annoucements / Open positions
VW is (obviously) still making the news. There are rougly 8m cars with the defeat device in Europe, worldwide an estimated 11m. So there’ll be rather large costs that VW will face in the near future. Those costs will compromise the liability law suit costs from not adhering to the regulation, the fraud costs, the costs of taking the defeat devices out of the 11m cars, the reduction in demand especially in the US where VW’s cars are not going to be used to such an extent anymore, the reputational loss, the loss of the competitive edge, and the costs of needing to restructure its production lines.
In general, everyone is simply angry with the fact that a company like VW is toying with them, with the trade-mark Made in Germany, with the regulations, and that they could get away with it for nearly a decade. BUT, this is also not the first incidence of this kind, other car manufacturers have toyed with people’s lifes to a similar extend, see the discussion HERE. For example, Ford and General Motors have done even worse.
We know that all companies are relying on Cost-Benefit Analysis in their decisions, and too often the company’s private benefits minus expected liability costs exceed the costs of adhering to safety standards. That, obviously, is the reason for governmental regulations in nearly all markets as well as a huge literature on liability laws. And these regulations should not be cheap-talked. For example, the Clean Air Act in the US is estimated to have led to an additional two years of life expectancy in the US alone.
There are unfortunately some who question the importance of this scandale. Tyler Cowen, a well-known economist, for example, believes that corporate fraud is not the biggest problem. He writes that the World Health Organization is estimating that roughly 7m people die each year due to air pollution, so on that scale VW’s fraud is more a rounding error than anything else. John Whitehead from env-econ.net takes him on and trashes this argument.
The real problem is that everyone dies?
There are two messages here. The first is that the VW’s fraud is not a big deal for two reasons. First, after putting the numbers of deaths in the appropriate context, they are just a rounding error. I disagree with this approach because there is nothing in economics, that I’m aware of, to suggest that the proportion of deaths matters whatsoever.
The second reason this isn’t a big deal is because we all cause air pollution every day, am I right or what? Through our own inability to stop killing people by our daily driving and cooking, we are just as guilty as VW! I disagree with this argument because air quality regulations are designed to reduce deaths when the benefits of doing so are less than the costs.
As a bonus, energietransition.de discusses inhowfar the VW scandal may help induce a shift towards more electrical vehicles on the market. And it is argued that the outlook is good:
The VW scandal is a window of opportunity to embarrass the German government into real support for progress in the transport sector – and German car makers into true cleantech innovation. Until recently, Merkel took strict EU car regulations to be a threat. The lesson now is clear: save German car makers by making them leaders in clean technology!
Finally, there is always the question of why we so desperately continue to rely on cars at all. Alexandros Nikitas discusses some options with which we could wean ourselves off them, while Jillian Anable argues that not using the car for even just a day may already help in breaking our habit of relying on them so extensively.
Finally it came to my attention as well, this is directly from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), originally published 18 September 2015:
EPA is issuing a notice of violation (NOV) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (collectively referred to as Volkswagen). The NOV alleges that four-cylinder Volkswagen and Audi diesel cars from model years 2009-2015 include software that circumvents EPA emissions standards for certain air pollutants…
This results in cars that meet emissions standards in the laboratory or testing station, but during normal operation, emit nitrogen oxides, or NOx, at up to 40 times the standard…
The allegations cover roughly 482,000 diesel passenger cars sold in the United States since 2008.
What is the implication of this?
Maximilian Auffhammer is one researcher who tends to have very insightful and challenging posts. In one of his latest posts he discusses recent empirical evidence on whether or not building codes improve the energy efficiency of a house: http://wp.me/p2cNHE-Pg.I discuss his thoughts and also talk about why the trends in household electricity use are problematic.